Talking to London Live about being a female politician
Posted Monday, 8 December 2014 at 21:04
Interview in The Independent
Posted Monday, 8 December 2014 at 17:47
Click here to read my inteview in today's Independent
Opening new care home in Meppershall
Posted Friday, 28 November 2014 at 17:53
Click here to read the story in Bedfordshire on Sunday
The NHS Private Members Bill
Posted Thursday, 27 November 2014 at 10:45
Thank you to all the constituents who contacted me about National Health Service (Amended Duties and Powers) Bill. While I respect the sincerity of your points of view, I believe that the proposed Bill would be an unnecessary upheaval and would take our NHS backwards.
I am absolutely committed to the founding principles of the NHS - that care is free at the point of use based on need, not on the ability to pay. I know Ministers share this view and the Health and Social Care Act does nothing to change this. It will not privatise the NHS.
The Government rightly undertook reforms to strengthen the NHS and invest an extra £12.7 billion in the service. There are 850,000 more operations being delivered each year compared to 2010, and thousands of more doctors and nurses. I am also proud that the Prime Minister has promised to continue this investment in the next Parliament. This will mean spending on the NHS will rise in every year in real-terms.
I believe giving local doctors the power to make decisions about who provides local NHS services was an important step forward. Local doctors know their patients best and are already improving patient care up and down the country through their Clinical Commissioning Groups. But the Government has always been clear that Ministers are ultimately responsible for the performance of the NHS.
The NHS and its doctors are clear that choice and competition are important tools to deliver high quality care for patients. That is why the previous Labour Government introduced competition and the private sector. When Labour left office, private providers delivered five per cent of NHS services and after four years of the Coalition Government this has increased to just six per cent.
Posted Tuesday, 25 November 2014 at 14:59
Posted Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 10:56
Last night I spoke and voted in favour of Zac Goldsmith’s amendment to the Recall Bill. We need real recall that will give real power to voters. The government bill is not that.
It is a deep shame that the amendment didn’t pass, a majority of MPs in all parties voted it down. But this is not the end and we will continue to push for these important powers to be handed to our constituents.
Watch the speech here.
Nadine Dorries (Mid Bedfordshire) (Con): I speak to the amendments as someone who is accustomed to being in the eye of a political storm. I am possibly the only MP in the Chamber who has had an attempt at recall mounted against them. When my hon. Friend the Member for Richmond Park (Zac Goldsmith) first tabled the amendments, he asked me to speak about my own experience. At the time I decided not to do so, because I did not think it was particularly appropriate. But having heard some of the hot air in the Chamber tonight, I feel compelled to use my own example, and its consequences, to lay some of those bogus arguments to rest.
Two years ago today, I took part in a reality TV programme called “I’m a Celebrity…Get Me Out of Here” and I disappeared to Australia. The hon. Member for North Durham (Mr Jones) asked what would happen if a local or national newspaper ran a campaign against an MP, but I had every national newspaper against me and not just for a day but for a month—in my study they stand waist high. Of course, none of those newspapers said that Parliament was in recess. None of them said that I did not miss any Government legislation. None of them said that I had spent every day of the summer in my constituency office and the trip was my holiday. There were even Members who joined in the outcry against me, giving comments to the newspapers from their sun loungers from Barbados to Benidorm. Nobody said, “Oh, by the way, we are in recess”, and a massive media storm ensued. Even my local radio station, BBC Three Counties, went to my constituency and vox-popped constituents. It did not take comments from constituents who were backing me—it refused to do so. The national media created a perfect storm and rode on the crest of it for an entire month, giving them thousands of column inches.
In the middle of all of that, someone decided that I should be recalled and that they would get together a national petition. Out of the entire UK population of 65 million, one month to the day after the furore started, a national online, click and send petition—the type to which someone can contribute when they have had a bottle of red wine, or been down the pub, or read the local newspaper and got really angry with what they have read—had just 766 signatures. Facebook was a different story. The petition got just 16 likes. So it is nonsense to say that the media can attack Members or whip up their constituents to get them recalled. There was no national newspaper, political programme or radio station that did not have it in for me during that month when I was in Australia—
My constituents did not sign that petition because they know the kind of MP that I am. I am not a party-political MP. When I am in my constituency I am not a Conservative MP—I represent everybody, regardless of what political party they vote for, and my constituents know that. They also know that I will go the extra mile. I do not do surgeries once a month—most times I do them every week. My constituents know that I will go the extra mile for them. They know that I do not get involved in grubby political games in Parliament. They know that I represent them. I put my constituency before my party, and I put my constituents before Westminster. I have always done that- My constituents know exactly what type of MP I am. There has been an elephant sat inside—not outside—the Chamber tonight, and it is the reason why the Government have introduced the Bill. They have not introduced it because the public have infinite trust in us, or because they think MPs are wonderful people that work hard for their constituents. The Bill has been introduced because the people do not trust politicians any more. They have no faith in us. They need to know that they can have more democratic control over what we do here because they do not like a lot of what they see going on.
I know that most MPs come here to work hard and look after their constituents, but the Whips Office holds the keys to power and ministerial ambition so there is a difference between the consideration that some MPs give to their constituents and what they give to their own political ambition and their climb up the greasy pole. The difference is as vast as that between sound and silence. Many MPs are one person in their constituencies and a different person entirely at Westminster. People are sick of the Whip system, the parliamentary system and the party-political system. They do not want to see that any more because they want people to represent them. They want their opinions represented here. They do not want grimy deals done such as, “Don’t defect to UKIP and I’ll make you a Minister” or “Don’t vote for this Bill because the Liberal Democrats don’t want you to.” They know about those deals and they are disgusted. That is why we have the Bill.
The amendments could have been a little grittier, but it is vital that we vote for them. It has been argued tonight that Members could be removed for their position on a particular policy, but if they are good MPs that is nonsense. It has been argued that an MP could be removed because of a political row, but I am sure that all the 766 people who signed that petition were supporters of the Opposition. During the 2009 expenses crisis, one thing we knew was that everybody nationally hated MPs, but on a constituency basis many people said, “No, we don’t like MPs, but our MP is okay.” That is because they know what we do for them and the type of person we are. When MPs do fall down, it is because they ignore their constituents, do the grubby deals and put their own personal ambition above the interests of their constituency. A former Minister complained about the Bill today. I asked whether he would vote for it if he was still a Minister, and he said, “Of course I would.” That is the root of the problem—collective responsibility and putting party first.
We need this Bill. I do not believe that we will have the benefit of the British public’s trust unless the Bill goes further and we vote through the amendments tabled by my hon. Friend the Member for Richmond Park. Any MP arguing that thousands of people, just because they are political opponents, would walk down to the town hall and put their names on a register to get them out because the local newspaper has a campaign against them, is talking absolute nonsense. Nobody has anything to fear. If you are a good MP, if you put your constituency first, if you are part of the people in your constituency, and if you take no notice of your Whips Office but do what you should do in principle and do what is right for the people who elected you, then you have nothing to fear from either the amendments or the Bill.
Please vote for Darcey!
Posted Thursday, 25 September 2014 at 11:11
Darcey has entered the Westminster Dog Show and would appreciate your vote.
Find a copy of her canine CV here
and vote for her here
Alameda Middle School Visit to Parliament
Posted Thursday, 11 September 2014 at 13:37
It was a real pleasure to welcome Alameda Middle School to Parliament yesterday. I hope they all enjoyed the tour despite getting stuck in traffic on the way down the M1.
Our question and answer session was lively, fun and challenging for me! The youngsters asked some very probing and intelligent questions.
It’s always great to see kids coming to Parliament to learn more about our democracy, how it works and what I do as their MP.
Millions Announced for Investment in Bedfordshire's Transport Infrastructure
Posted Monday, 7 July 2014 at 10:51
I was delighted to support Bedfordshire’s bid for funding from the South East Midlands Local Enterprise Partnership for investment in, among other things in the area, dualling the remaining parts of the A421 between Milton Keynes and Bedford.
Such infrastructure spending is vital to keep Mid-Bedfordshire moving when we have ever increasing numbers of cars on our roads, with more to come as we welcome further residential developments in the years ahead.
This government is putting our economy back on track by reducing waste and inefficiency in the public finances while investing more in the infrastructure we so badly need. We are currently seeing levels of spending on infrastructure not seen since the Victorian age and it’s important that Mid-Bedfordshire gets its fair share of that.
I want all my constituents to know that, while this latest investment will enable the construction of thousands of new homes in the area, I will continue to fight for all developments to be sustainable and in keeping with the character of the area. This is not a green light for developers to build whatever, wherever they like.
Cranfield Turbine Application Rejected
Posted Thursday, 3 July 2014 at 10:38
I was delighted to hear yesterday evening that the wind turbine application near Cranfield has been rejected.
This proposal for a wind farm had nothing to do with providing green energy and was all about a corporate landowner milking government subsidies while blighting a picturesque landscape.
It was a real pleasure to support the local community as they rose up, almost as one, against the application and I would like to say a special thank you to Councillor Sue Clark.
It just goes to show, the localism agenda isn’t dead and people power can still save communities when they act together!
Saturday's Rally Against Cranfield Turbines
Posted Tuesday, 24 June 2014 at 11:32
On Saturday, I attended a rally in Cranfield to add my support to local residents as they turned out to object to the proposed six turbine wind farm that FCC are planning to erect around this strong community and beautiful village.
When I arrived there were twenty or so cars at the proposed meeting place and, I have to say, my heart did sink a little.
Yet as Councillor Sue Clark and I walked out to the demonstration point we could hardly believe our eyes because, looking up the road, we saw hundreds of residents pouring towards us - far more than we could ever have hoped for.
Sue and her team had arranged for an airship to fly at the exact height and location of one of the turbines. This was a shock to many as the developer, FCC, in their planning PR and literature had depicted the turbines to be much smaller and further away than they actually are. The strength of feeling against the turbines is huge as it would totally blight and destroy the local environment for thousands of people.
On Saturday, Cranfield residents did what they do best, they united as a community against a monstrous proposal which has no foundation in green policy but is rooted in a desire by a big business to benefit from government subsidies. This is demonstrated by the fact that the turbines are not proposed to be in an area that would benefit from wind, but which is determined by geographical location and cost.
I cannot help but add at this point that the Liberal Democrats are 100% in support of wind turbine technology and would support this proposal.
If you feel you could support a demonstration on the day this proposal will be debated at Central Beds Council, please watch this space for further information.
Let's hope that along with other inappropriate developments proposed to alter forever our green haven of Mid Beds, we can also defeat this one.
Anti-Turbine Demonstration in Cranfield on Saturday
Posted Thursday, 19 June 2014 at 13:22
This Saturday I will attend a rally in Cranfield to oppose a planning application for the construction of a wind farm in the nearby area.
The planning application is for six turbines to be placed around the perimeter of the former land-fill site south-east of Cranfield. Their positioning has been chosen entirely according to the geography on the ground and not where they will be able to catch the most wind.
From 10:30am on Saturday an airship will be flown at turbine height, 300ft, to demonstrate the powerfully negative visual impact this project will have on Cranfield and surrounding villages in this beautiful part of the English countryside.
I’m happy to support local people in the fight to protect their villages from having these turbines imposed upon them. Wind farms are an overly-subsidised, inefficient form of generating power at the best of time. Putting one on this location aims to serve only the needs of the corporate landowner and not local people, the national grid or the taxpayer.
Anyone interested in joining us should gather on Wood End Road/ 200 yards from Lodge Road junction, Cranfield, near ‘The Kennels’. It will be clearly signed. Please bring placards and posters. Parking is available at Cranfield Court, Wood End Road. Refreshments will be available afterwards.